The Power of Text Message Evidence in Criminal Defense Cases

by May 22, 2024Criminal Defense

In the modern era, text messages have become an increasingly important form of evidence in criminal cases. At Davis & Hoss, we’ve seen firsthand how a thorough analysis of text message evidence can be a game-changer for the defense. In this post, we’ll discuss three types of cases where text message analysis played a crucial role in defending our clients.

1.Domestic Violence Allegations

In one case, our client was accused of domestic violence by his ex-partner. However, a detailed examination of their text message history revealed that the accuser had a
history of making false allegations and threatening our client. The messages showed that the accuser had a motive to fabricate the charges and had even discussed their plans to do so with a friend. By presenting this evidence in court, we were able to cast significant doubt on the accuser’s credibility and secure a favorable outcome for our client.

2. Drug Trafficking Charges

Another client faced serious drug trafficking charges based on the testimony of an alleged co-conspirator. But when we analyzed the text messages between the two individuals, a different story emerged. The messages revealed that the co-conspirator had a history of drug dealing and had been pressuring our client to participate in their illegal activities. The texts also showed that our client had repeatedly refused to get involved and had even tried to distance themselves from the co-conspirator. This
evidence was crucial in demonstrating that our client was not a willing participant in the alleged drug trafficking scheme.

3. Sexual Assault Accusations

In a case involving allegations of sexual assault, text messages between the accuser and our client proved to be a critical piece of exculpatory evidence. The messages, exchanged before and after the alleged incident, showed that the encounter was
consensual and that the accuser had expressed no distress or disapproval afterwards. The texts also revealed inconsistencies in the accuser’s account of events, which we were able to use to undermine their credibility at trial.